Squarepig’s Weblog

Snorts about life!

Back to the Beginning

“Ask Square Pig how much she paid for that box,” says Square Pig Senior, chuckling under his breath and staring at an old green kist in SP’s lounge with the paint peeling off. Square Pig’s friend turned around and raised an enquiring ear.

“Five hundred rand,” Square Pig mumbled through her snout. Senior roared with laughter.

“Well I like it – it’s old!!” she stated, stamping her hoof into the ground. They all stared at the green box in Square Pig’s lounge. It WAS old – there was no doubt about that!!

 ————————————————————————

I’m sure I’m not the only one who feels comforted by old things! In a world of microwaves, overnight building developments, shopping malls and quick fixes – there is something reassuring about old things; the amount of time it took to make them and the clues they give us to a by-gone era less superficial than our own. 

I went to the Irma Stern museum a while back and was literally transfixed by the figures she had painted on her dining room furniture. Not only were they hand-painted but they represented all the mystery and strangeness of Medieval times. I loved them.

I don’t think I’m alone in this fascination. “Harry Potter”, “Lord of the Rings”, victorian wall motifs, ”stressed” furniture, retro chic and a thousand Long Street antique shops (all with exorbitant prices) speak of a generation’s longing for something old and mysterious, something grounded in the tried and tested, something which instinctively we know has inherant value, something we’ve lost and desperately want back! 

In spiritual terms, I see this longing too - yoga,  mysticism, monasticism and meditation, in the pilgrims we make to England, India, China where we hope the “ancient” walls will tell us something we don’t already know, something which can’t be listed in “wikipedia” or “iol”!!!  

So it was with some delight that I found this quote in the emerging conversations about Christianity:

…it seems as if those involved are charting a new direction for Christianity. Yet time and again familiar – sounding place names gently remind us that this discovery is at the same time a re-discovery…and my conclusion is this: the terrotory I thought I was helping to chart was actually discovered a long time ago by my ancestors. It is both frustrating and comforting that no matter how fast I run, those who have long since died have already arrived at where I am attempting to go. (Peter Rollins “How (not) to Speak of God”)

      

January 28, 2008 - Posted by squarepig | Peter Rollins | , | 6 Comments

6 Comments »

  1. This is nogal deep, Squarepig. Now I know why I’m friends with you:-)

    Comment by Linda | January 28, 2008 | Reply

  2. I have dissed the word “religion” for most of my life. But now I have learned its meaning have grown fond of it. “To Bind Back”, re – to repeat; ligion – as in ligament, that which binds.

    For my musings on this take a look at http://soundandsilence.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/newoldwineskins/ where I investigate what was meant in reference to new and old wine.

    Comment by Nic Paton | January 31, 2008 | Reply

  3. Indeed! I think Pete was quoting G.K. Chesterton’s introduction to “Orthodoxy” where he mentions South Africa in a very negative way! Here’s the full bit:

    “I have often had a fancy for writing a romance about an English yachtsman who slightly miscalculated his course and discovered England under the impression that it was a new island in the South Seas. I always find, however, that I am either too busy or too lazy to write this fine work, so I may as well give it away for the purposes of philosophical illustration. There will probably be a general impression that the man who landed (armed to the teeth and talking by signs) to plant the British flag on that barbaric temple which turned out to be the Pavilion at Brighton, felt rather a fool. I am not here concerned to deny that he looked a fool. But if you imagine that he felt a fool, or at any rate that the sense of folly was his sole or his dominant emotion, then you have not studied with sufficient delicacy the rich romantic nature of the hero of this tale. His mistake was really a most enviable mistake; and he knew it, if he was the man I take him for. What could be more delightful than to have in the same few minutes all the fascinating terrors of going abroad combined with all the humane security of coming home again? What could be better than to have all the fun of discovering South Africa without the disgusting necessity of landing there? What could be more glorious than to brace one’s self up to discover New South Wales and then realize, with a gush of happy tears, that it was really old South Wales. This at least seems to me the main problem for philosophers, and is in a manner the main problem of this book. How can we contrive to be at once astonished at the world and yet at home in it? How can this queer cosmic town, with its many-legged citizens, with its monstrous and ancient lamps, how can this world give us at once the fascination of a strange town and the comfort and honour of being our own town?”

    Comment by Roger Saner | February 4, 2008 | Reply

  4. Wow Squarepig, quite profound.

    I remembered a phrase form math – “You can’t tell the direction of a line based on a single point.” And geography – “Triangulate your position.”

    These basic concepts can equally be applied to Godde.

    We know who Godde is as we reconise that S/He is also the Godde of our forebears. Time and culture and issues change with the passing of time. It is easier to get a triangulated view on who Godde is as S/He has been involved over a long period of time with various people through different historical challenges.

    Comment by timvictor | February 5, 2008 | Reply

  5. Roger, been bothering me was Chesterton negative because of Apartheid in SOuth Africa. I was under the impression he was living sometime in the 18th century though – so is that a colonial mind set coming through??? Need some light here…

    Comment by squarepig | February 22, 2008 | Reply

  6. Tim, what do you know, I triangulated and I’m not even vaguely a mathematician. Wonders never cease!!! Ha ha

    Comment by squarepig | February 22, 2008 | Reply


Leave a comment